Intellectual Property Right services - trade mark is not ...

Service Tax

June 20, 2017

Intellectual Property Right services - trade mark is not registered in India - services received by the appellant-assessee are not covered under IPR service, under Section 65 (105) (zzr) of the Finance Act, 1994.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Intellectual Property Right services - trade mark is not ...

Service Tax

June 20, 2017

You may also like:

IPR Service - "Hallmark" - In the present case, "Hallmark" is not at all any intellectual property governed by any law for such right. Section 9 of Trade Marks Act, 1999...

Levy of Service Tax - royalty paid to overseas entity - transferring of technical know-how cannot be equated to transfer of Intellectual Property Right and that as long...

‘Intellectual Property Rights Services’ – It is well settled that there is no law relating to the trade secrets or confidential information in India. Therefore, the...

Intellectual Property Right Services - the transfer of right is absolutely in terms of the agreement, therefore, proviso Section 65(55)b) of the act are not applicable - AT

Levy of service tax - Intellectual Property Services - The Tribunal observed that the technology transfer did not qualify as intellectual property rights under Section...

Benefit of SSI Exemption - Use of Brand name of others - German company, has assigned the trade mark 'BILZ' in favour of the assessee under Agreement dated 18.06.1996...

Services of Manpower on cost sharing basis to group companies - Service Tax liability for import of Intellectual Property Rights - matter requires reconsideration -...

Intellectual Property Right service - the appellant should deposit the interest because of the delayed payment of service tax to the extent of R&D cess - AT

Demand of service tax - Transfer of intellectual property right - Hdemand under ‘scientific and technical service' is not sustainable hence set aside - AT

Liability of service tax of Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) - the “Hallmark” is worldwide recognised quality mark and not an Intellectual Property Right of appellant....

Quick Updates: