Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2017 Year 2017 This

Revision u/s 264 - period of limitation - The petitioner had ...

Income Tax

June 24, 2017

Revision u/s 264 - period of limitation - The petitioner had applied before the AO u/s 154 within four years of the order sought to be corrected. The petitioner did not delay in filing the petition u/s 264 beyond the prescribed of one year from the date of passing of the order u/s 154 by the AO - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - It is manifest that only suo-motu power of the Commissioner under Section 264 of the IT Act, is restricted against an order...

  2. Rectification u/s 154 - Period of limitation - Late fee u/s. 234E - as per sub-section (7) of Section 154 of the Act, as no amendment under the said section shall be...

  3. Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - period of limitation - the original assessment u/s 143(3) is dated 21.11.2011 - the order u/s 154 has been passed on 29.06.2017, which...

  4. Period of limitations u/s 153 - To include order of PCCIT/ CCIT u/s 263 or 264 for revision order which were not available earlier.

  5. Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - petitioner has not waived his appellate right - delay of 2 years, 10 months and 8 days can not be condoned - HC

  6. Condonation of delay - revision u/s 264 - as the order u/s 143(1) came to be passed within this one year itself, writ petitioner had taken the first step to have income...

  7. Rectification u/s 154 - period of limitation - original order passed by the AO dated 05/04/2011 - AO has already passed a suo-moto rectification order u/s 154 dated...

  8. Revision petition u/s. 264 - disallowance of carry forward of loss to subsequent years - CIT while disposing of the 264 petition of the assessee, had clearly directed...

  9. Revision u/s 264 - application for revision was rejected because it was not accompanied by the requisite fee of Rs.500/- An opportunity should be given to cure the same - HC

  10. Revision of other orders u/s 264 - petitioners sought to expressly withdraw the revision petition filed u/s 264 - application was pending for decision - Thus by not...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates