Refund claim - time limitation - whether the refund of service ...

Service Tax

July 20, 2017

Refund claim - time limitation - whether the refund of service tax in terms of N/N. 52/2001-ST dated 30-12-2011 in respect of service tax paid on the input service and used for export of service is admissible when it is filed beyond the limitation of one year as provided under said notification? - Held No

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - time limitation - whether the refund of service ...

Service Tax

July 20, 2017

You may also like:

Simplified scheme for electronic refund of service tax to exporters - Ntf. No. 52/2011 Dated: December 30, 2011

Time limit applicable to file refund claim in terms of N/N. 41/2007-ST dated 06/10/2007 - There is no provision to extend the said time limit - AT

ST CBEC issues clarification on prosecution provisions introduced vide Finance Act, 2001 in service tax – Prosecution limit is ₹ 10 Lacs

Refund claim - appellant, a 100% EOU - refund claim of service tax paid by them, as per the provisions of Notification No. 41/2007-ST - Appeal by revenue against order...

Refund claim - N/N. 41/2007-ST dated 06/10/2007 - the refund of Service tax is available in spite of claiming drawback - AT

Refund claim of Cenvat credit - Export - Nexus between input and output service - service tax paid on business auxiliary service - ST paid on reverse charge basis -...

Refund of service tax - developer unit in SEZ - claim of refund prior to the exemption notifications no 9/2009-ST issued - refund allowed - AT

Appointment of Central Excise Officers in relation to service tax refunds arising out of Notification No. 52/2011-Service Tax, dated 30.12.2011 - Ntf. No. 33/2011...

Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2013- ST, dated the 1st July, 2013 so as to allow refund of Swachh Bharat Cess paid on specified services used in an SEZ - Notification

Claim of refund - SEZ unit - Notification No. 09/2009-ST and 17/2011-ST - mere supply of surplus power in DTA as mentioned in Rule 47 of SEZ Rules, cannot be construed...

Quick Updates: