Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2018 Year 2018 This

Penalty u/s 77(2) of the FA 1994 - delay in filing the service ...

Service Tax

February 10, 2018

Penalty u/s 77(2) of the FA 1994 - delay in filing the service tax return - penalty of ₹ 20,000/- for each return - When the penalty has been imposed under Section 77(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, in that circumstance penalty under Section 70 cannot be imposed on the assessee. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Imposition of penalty u/s 76 of the FA, 1994 - delayed payment of tax - financial difficulty - invocation of section 80 - it is a fit case to waive the penalty - AT

  2. Imposition of penalties u/s 77 (2) and 78 of the FA, 1994 - appellant has not been able to justify non-filing of returns with the department or informing the department...

  3. Delay in filing of of eTDS return - Penalty U/s.272A(2)(k) - There is reasonable cause for delay in filing ETDS return U/s 273B - levy of penalty cancelled - AT

  4. Penalty u/s 76, 77 and 78 of FA - No malafide can be attributed to the respondent, who is organized under Government of India - No penalty.

  5. Penalty under Sections 77 and 78 - delayed payment of service tax - The statutory levies cannot be obviated for so long merely because the computer was down - levy of...

  6. Penalty under section 77(c) on Director - delay in payment of service tax - No provision for imposing personal penalty on the Director - AT

  7. Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - evasion of service tax - appellant collected service tax from the service receivers but failed to deposit the...

  8. Levying penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) for late filing of TDS returns - the ‘Person Responsible’ had a bonafide reason for the delay in filing TDS returns - No penalty.

  9. Penalty - ignorance of law - misguidance by the Consultant - ignorance of law is enough to set-aside penalty under Section 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - AT

  10. Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of FA - there was no suppression of fact with an intention to evade payment of tax, established in this case. Since the Appellant has...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates