Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2018 Year 2018 This

Penalty on partner - Firm already penalized - The appellant also ...

Central Excise

June 7, 2018

Penalty on partner - Firm already penalized - The appellant also tried his best to conceal the relevant records and played a pivotal role in evasion of duty with the help of middlemen, second stage dealers and buyers. - Levy of penalty confirmed

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Imposition of penalty on partners - penalty on partner is not imposable when the firm is penalised under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.

  2. Penalty u/s 271C – reasonable cause - The assessees are partners in a firm – Both the assessees has paid interest to firm without deducting tax at source - No penalty - AT

  3. Demanding duty from the firm and penalties were imposed on the firm & partner both - The appeal filed by the firm cannot be considered as joint appeal - AT

  4. Penalty u/s 112 - since penalty has been imposed on partnership firm under Section 112 (a), separate penalty on its partner would not be justified - AT

  5. Penalty levied u/s 271D - capital contributed by the partner in the partnership firm does not tantamount to loan or deposit within the meaning of section 269SS - No penalty - AT

  6. Imposition of Simultaneous Penalties - Whether CESTAT erred in imposing simultaneous penalties on both the Partner and Partnership firm – Matter referred to larger bench - HC

  7. Tribunal was justified in holding that no separate penalties were warranted on the partners in addition to the penalty on the partnership firm - AT

  8. Demand – personal penalty – penalty is sought to be imposed not only on the firm but also on the partners which is clearly not permissible- AT

  9. Penalty under Section 11AC - The partner of the partnership firm had already paid the duty before issue of the show cause notice in order to avoid legal proceedings. In...

  10. Deduction u/s 40(b) - assessee was indirectly trying to bring in M/s Deloitte Haskins & Sells, Mumbai, another firm, which was already a participating firm, as its...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates