Tribunal as well as two Commissioners of Excise department ...

Central Excise

August 24, 2018

Tribunal as well as two Commissioners of Excise department exceeded the jurisdiction and committed an error in making observations against the High Court and the Supreme Court decisions.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Tribunal as well as two Commissioners of Excise department ...

Central Excise

August 24, 2018

You may also like:

Whether the question of jurisdiction of the AO not raised before ould be raised for the first time in second appeal before the Tribunal - Held no - HC

Rebate – jurisdiction of Tribunal – exclusion of the jurisdiction of the appellate Tribunal is expressly stated in the Statute - Tribunal was in error in entertaining...

Jurisdiction of Superintendent to pass the order - Monetary limit - The High Court noted that, the circular dated 9.2.2018 limited the power of the Superintendent,...

Remission of central excise duty on semi-finished goods destroyed in the fire accident - The Commissioner clearly exceeded his jurisdiction in deciding this issue by...

Rightful owners of 4000 shares or not - Exercise of jurisdiction u/s 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act - The Appellate Tribunal emphasizes that the NCLT's...

Power of AO in remanded matter - impact of direction of Tribunal - role of the AO was limited to giving effect to the directions of the Tribunal - if the Department had...

Revision u/sec. 263 - CIT has exceeded his jurisdiction in directing the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

Attachment of the movable and immovable properties - priority over the rights - Preference to Banking company or Central Excise Department - Preference of Excise...

Claim of Excise Department - Liability to pay Interest on principal amount - co. in liquidation - Claim of interest of the Department (Central Excise) dis-allowed - HC

Rejection of appellants’ challenge to Summons, summoning the appellants to appear before the Second respondent - The Court found that the second respondent had...

Quick Updates: