Jurisdiction to raise demand u/s 11A central excise - extended ...

Central Excise

December 21, 2018

Jurisdiction to raise demand u/s 11A central excise - extended period of limitation - petitioner availed the benefit of the Duty Free Credit Entitlement (DFCE) scheme. - the petitioner claimed to be a manufacturer and obtained registration for the same, the adjudicating authority found the petitioner to be a trader - Issuance of SCN and order sustained.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Jurisdiction to raise demand u/s 11A central excise - extended ...

Central Excise

December 21, 2018

You may also like:

Recovery of interest - extended period of Limitation u/s 11A – limitation period as prescribed in Section 11A would be applicable for recovery of interest also - AT

ST - Revenue neutral exercise - demand can not be raising invoking extended period of limitation.

Price variation clause - applicability of period of limitation on demand of Interest under central excise - AT

Validity and scope of of SCN - Service Rendered to RBI - Cleaning Service - demand raised by invoking extended period of limitation - there is contradiction in the said...

It is a common knowledge that if the goods cleared for export, Central Excise duty does not arise - demands raised on Sand Stone Tiles and Khatu Marble Tiles set-aside - AT

Duty demand - sizing and warping machines which is assembled at site - whether manufacturing activity or not - demand set aside on the ground of jurisdiction and...

Clandestine removal - SCN - Invocation of Extended Period of Limitation - there is no provision under the Central Excise Act, which prohibits issuing more than one show...

Interest is liable to paid even if no SCN is issued u/s 11A of central excise - order of CESTAT reversed - HC

Closure of their factory due to disconnection of power supply - demand of central excise duty - power connection of the appellant unit was never restored during the...

Short/non-payment of service tax - Jurisdiction to raise the Demand - The Tribunal notes that during the period in question, the Appellant was registered in Mumbai and...

Quick Updates: