Reassessment - Whatever the validity of the AO's contention ...

Income Tax

December 25, 2018

Reassessment - Whatever the validity of the AO's contention regarding such dividend, surely, he cannot reopen the assessment beyond the period of 4 years from the end of the relevant assessment year, without there being any element of lack of true and full disclosure on the part of the petitioner.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reassessment - Whatever the validity of the AO's contention ...

Income Tax

December 25, 2018

You may also like:

Reassessment proceedings after information received from Director of Investigation regarding bogus/accommodation entries - HC

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - no notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was issued by the AO for taking case under scrutiny - The Tribunal meticulously examined...

Assessments under Section 153A - whatever was recovered during the search having been destroyed in a fire was not available with the AO when he framed the assessments -...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reason to believe - Addition u/s 69C on account of the capital introduced by the partner and unsecured loans - The Tribunal...

Validity of reopening of assessment - Approval of PCIT u/s 151 - The Tribunal acknowledged the Assessee's argument regarding the mechanical approval granted by the PCIT....

Validity of re-reassessment u/s 147 - scope of section 292BB - non-issuance of notice u/s 143(2) is not a procedural irregularity, the same cannot be cured u/s 292BB

Reopening of an assessment beyond 4 years - issue of bogus purchases - specific and concrete information available with the AO - Reassessment proceedings sustained -...

Reassessment - validity of notice issued u/s 148 - the Tribunal could not have gone into the adequacy and sufficiency of reasons - HC

Reassessment - Validity of notice u/s 148 of the Act – Reason to believe – The material found in post search enquiries could form a “reason to believe“ that income had...

Validity of reassessment of order - When the discrepancies are there, it will have to be clarified by the assessee - the notices were rightly issued u/s 148 of the Act - HC

Quick Updates: