Penalty u/s 271D - reasonable cause - contravention of sec. ...

Income Tax

July 20, 2012

Penalty u/s 271D - reasonable cause - contravention of sec. 269SS - cash was taken by discounting cheques to meet the urgent business needs of the assessee - deletion of penalty is warranted - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271D - reasonable cause - contravention of sec. ...

Income Tax

July 20, 2012

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271D - accepting loan in cash - reasonable cause - the AO has neither doubted the impugned transaction nor any addition made in this behalf even under...

Penalty levied u/s. 271D r.w.s. 273B - reasonable cause for the assessee to accept loan over ₹ 20,000/- in cash - levy of penalty confirmed.

Penalty u/s 271D - default u/s 269SS - assessee has taken loan from his father and paternal aunt, who are family members and such transactions would not attract penalty u/s 271D

Penalty u/s 271D - co-operative bank has accepted deposits in cash exceeding ₹ 20,000/- from its members - Bona-fide belief of the assessee that the transactions...

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of section 269SS - Reasonable Cause u/s 273B - The claim of the assessee is that receipt of money by way of cash itself is a reasonable...

Levy of penalty u/s 271D - Cash transaction in connection with violation of section 269SS - reasonable cause - Sale of residential flats to an agriculturist - cash sale...

Penalty u/s 271D - Default u/s 269SS - loans in question were received by the assessee in cash from her daughter and son-in-law - no penalty leviable

Penalty u/s 271D - receipt in cash being undisclosed income - Loan or advance is a sine qua non or foundational fact for the applicability of the provisions of Section...

Penalty u/s 271D - Acceptance of loan in Cash by the appellant firm from its agriculturist customer - violation of provisions of section 269SS - penalty confirmed - HC

Violation of section 269SS and 269T - cheque discounting business - The assessee had to discount the cheque for cash - There was no question of levying any penalty under...

Quick Updates: