Penalty u/s 78 of FA - Non-payment of service tax - the issue is ...

Service Tax

April 19, 2019

Penalty u/s 78 of FA - Non-payment of service tax - the issue is a bonafide dispute of legal interpretation of the newly introduced provision, no malafide can be attributed to the appellant so as to call for imposition of any penalty.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 78 of FA - Non-payment of service tax - the issue is ...

Service Tax

April 19, 2019

You may also like:

Reduction of penalty u/s 78 of FA - non-payment of service tax - appellant has not recorded the said transactions in their specified records - Penalty reduced to 50% of...

Imposition of penalty - Advertisement Agency Service - non-payment of Service tax - Section 78 - when the first SCN was issued, the subsequent SCN cannot allege...

Penalties u/s 76, 77 and 78 of FA - Non-payment of Service Tax collected from clients due to the financial difficulties - The delay / non-payment of service tax cannot...

Penalty - Non payment of service tax amount to the department despite being collected from the client - bonafide mistake - no penalty - AT

Penalty u/s 76, 77 and 78 of FA - No malafide can be attributed to the respondent, who is organized under Government of India - No penalty.

Waiver of penalty u/s 77 & 78 - during the period service tax liability under reverse charge mechanism was being disputed - penalty dropped - AT

Penalty u/s 76 and 78 of FA - continuous default in paying service tax - statute has provided for cases/situations where there is a possibility of payment of Service Tax....

Imposition of penalty u/s 76 and 78 of FA - There was an ignorance on the part of the assessees regarding the service tax liability on import of services from outside...

Penalty u/s 77(2) & 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - The issue is a bonafide dispute of legal interpretation of the newly introduced provision coupled with transaction...

Levy of penalty u/s 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - taxability of Sale of Space or Time for Advertisement - it is a case of bonafide mistake - no penalty - AT

Quick Updates: