Penalty - Confiscation of the goods – Merely because the ...

Customs

July 30, 2012

Penalty - Confiscation of the goods – Merely because the appellant had claimed a wrong classification, it cannot be held that the appellant has mis-declared the goods - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty - Confiscation of the goods – Merely because the ...

Customs

July 30, 2012

You may also like:

Export of the goods - claim of duty drawback - Mere allegation of wrong classification without proving intentional mala fide cannot lead to imposition of penalty - CGOVT

Classification of goods - Bulk Milk Cooler - confirmation of duty merely on the basis of allegation in the SCN without ascertaining the fact is wrong.

Fraudulent claims of duty drawbacks - Mis declaration of goods -charges levelled in the show cause notice stood established against the appellants - levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Levy of penalty and redemption fine - export of prohibited goods - The appellant made a wrong claim of export benefit under MEIS, being mis-advised by the CHA. However,...

Classification of goods - RBD Palm Stearin - Making a wrong claim of classification, per se, is neither fraud nor collusion nor wilful misstatement nor suppression of...

Imposition of penalty - Mis-declaration of imported goods - Smuggling - penalty cannot be imposed both on the proprietor as well as the firm.

Clandestine removal - issue of mis-classification - goods entered in RG-1 register - full stay granted. - AT

Import of consignment of consumer goods and household items from UAE - Mis declaration of goods - appellant is only an employee of the CHA firm - penalty reduced taking...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 and 117 of CA on CHA and G card holder - mis-classification and mis-declaration of goods - The negligence of both the appellants herein is...

Merely because the Insurance Company paid the assessee the value of goods including the excise duty paid, that would not render the availment of the cenvat credit wrong...

Quick Updates: