Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee has admitted part disallowance ...

Income Tax

May 2, 2019

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee has admitted part disallowance of expenses - admission of expenses could not be construed that the assessee has admitted allegations that he has furnished inaccurate particulars - AO need to demonstrate that the explanation of the expenditure given by the assessee was false - No penalty

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee has admitted part disallowance ...

Income Tax

May 2, 2019

You may also like:

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – mere admission of appeal by the High Court is sufficient to debar the penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance of interest expenditure under section 43B as well as disallowance export product development expenses - Just because the assessee...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c ) - the assessee's non-appealing of the issue does not tantamount to admission of addition - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - it was admitted by the Department that the information came from the assessee without any suggestion or detection from the Department - no penalty - AT

Penalty u/ s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance on account of personnel expenses, operative expenses and finance expenses - it a “mere disallowance” of an expense does not warrant...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - for such lump-sum disallowance out of wages on the basis of presumption, no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is leviable - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because, the assessee did not preferred any appeal against the said disallowance does not make it an inadvertent mistake - penalty confirmed - AT

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) – assessee in bona fide belief that Dharmada collections were not part of its income but were diverted by an overriding title towards...

Quick Updates: