Profiteering - the argument that that the price of the product ...

GST

May 8, 2019

Profiteering - the argument that that the price of the product was not increased at the time of introduction of GST when the rate of tax was increased to 28% and hence the question of reducing the prices when the rate of tax was decreased from 28% to 18% does not arise is legally not sustainable in view of the provision of section 171 of CGST Act, 2017

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - the argument that that the price of the product ...

GST

May 8, 2019

You may also like:

Profiteering - restaurant service supplied by the Respondent - the GST rate of 5% has been charged w.e.f. 15.11.2017 however the base prices of 170 products have been...

Profiteering - footwear - benefit of rate reduction of GST from 18% to 5% - It is evident that the Respondent had increased the base price of the product when the rate...

Profiteering - restaurant service supplied by the Respondent - allegation that the reduction in the rate of tax not passed on by way of commensurate reduction in price -...

Profiteering - supply of “Sanitary Napkins” - It's an admitted fact that the rate of tax on the product was reduced from 12% to NIL w.e.f. 27.07.2018 without the benefit...

Anti-Profiteering - benefit of reduction in the rate of GST in restaurant service - purchase of 6 Hara Bhara Kabab Sub - base price of the product increased from ₹...

Profiteering - Courier Service - increase in the courier charges rate from ₹ 69.50/- to ₹ 80/- - There was no reduction in the rate of tax on supply of...

Profiteering - DTH services - Entertainment Tax was neither allowed as ITC in pre GST era nor has been allowed in the GST era and same was borne by the Respondent hence...

Profiteering - construction services - The registration and approval of the projects and receipt of the payments had taken place in the post-GST regime and hence, there...

Profiteering - benefit of reduction in the GST rate not passed - base price of goods also increased - Respondent has violated the provisions of section 171 in as much as...

Profiteering - supply of Power Bank Portronics Power Slice 10 - It has been established that the Respondent has increased the base price of the product i.e. Power Bank,...

Profiteering - Restaurant Services - benefit of reduction in the rate of tax not passed on - contravention of the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 -...

Profiteering - purchase of Duplex Row House - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC although he had charged GST @12% w.e.f. 01.07.2017...

Profiteering - supply of “Samsung 80 CM (32 inches) HD ready LED TV 32FH4003” - If there was any increase in his costs the Respondent should have increased his prices...

Profiteering - Respondent had increased the price of the flat after the introduction of GST - benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) not passed on - the Respondent has...

Profiteering - The Respondent has resorted to profiteering by way of either increasing the base prices of the service while maintaining the same selling prices or by way...

Quick Updates: