Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there is no ‘tax sought to be evaded’, ...

Income Tax

May 25, 2019

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there is no ‘tax sought to be evaded’, in terms of Explanation 4 to section 271(1)(c), on which penalty could be levied - even as the asessee has not furnished any explanation during the penalty proceedings or in the appellate proceedings no penalty is leviable

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there is no ‘tax sought to be evaded’, ...

Income Tax

May 25, 2019

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - furnished wrong particulars of its income in terms of profits u/s 115JB - Computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Explanation is bonafide is, we find, supported by the fact that during assessment proceedings the assessee, realizing his mistake even before...

Rectification of mistake - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Since the concealment of income referred to in 271(1)(c) of the Act is in respect of tax sought to be evaded is...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act – short term capital gains was not disclosed in the return of income - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Disallowance of expenses on foreign travel – assessee have not furnished any explanation nor even the primary details in support of its claim -...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has given sufficient explanation though not found satisfactory by AO - No merit in levying penalty.

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - the mere disallowance under section 43B would not amount to concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - no penalty.

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

Penalty levied u/s 271 (1) (c) - As the appellants had disclosed the income, after detection by the department and as per the terms of settlement, the assessing officer...

Quick Updates: