Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Addition of bogus purchases - Tribunal ...

Income Tax

May 25, 2019

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Addition of bogus purchases - Tribunal in quantum proceedings reduced to 12.5% of such purchases - since income has been estimated by applying a percentage, hence the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can not be imposed in such cases

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Addition of bogus purchases - Tribunal ...

Income Tax

May 25, 2019

You may also like:

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

Addition u/s 68 - Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - concealment of particulars - unexplained cash credit / bogus purchases - At the time of assessment, the...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - As the penalty proceedings are distinct and independent to the quantum proceedings, in our considered view, penalty cannot be levied merely on...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Failure of the assessee to explain the source of cash deposit in the bank account - burden of proof - The ITAT acknowledged the...

Quantum of penalty - Tribunal erred in reducing the amount of penalty - Tribunal, failed to take into consideration the law laid down in the case of Dharamendra Textile...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Tribunal proceeded on hyper- technicalities and acted as though every seizure must entail initiation of proceedings u/s 271 of the Act - no penalty - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowances in the quantum assessment order - whether any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars proved? - Tribunal directs...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Any addition/disallowances made during the quantum proceedings does not automatically justify the levy of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) -...

Quick Updates: