Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2019 Year 2019 This

Disallowance u/s 37(1) - penalty amount - Merely because the ...

Income Tax

December 2, 2019

Disallowance u/s 37(1) - penalty amount - Merely because the assessee categorised the claim under “penalty levied on the assessee company for not complying to the terms of the contract”, is not permissible to the jump to the conclusion that such penalty was in respect of any offence or infraction of law committed by the assessee so as to invoke the provisions under Explanation 1 to section 37 (1) of the Act.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Disallowance of expenditure u/s 37(1) - Amount paid as penalty for using electricity during restricted hours - the amount paid being penalty, the AO was justified in...

  2. Levy of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance under section 40(a)(ia), does not amount to concealment of income - No penalty.

  3. Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

  4. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - the mere disallowance under section 43B would not amount to concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - no penalty.

  5. Amount paid towards penalty for breach of commercial contract by the assessee is not penal in nature, but compensatory in nature - deduction u/s 37(1) allowed - HC

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because, the assessee did not preferred any appeal against the said disallowance does not make it an inadvertent mistake - penalty confirmed - AT

  7. Disallowance of claim of CSR expenditure - the amendment is not with retrospective effect - CSR expenditure cannot be disallowed by invoking the explanation 2 to section...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because assessee claimed depreciation at 25% treating items to be plant, which claim was not acceptable to revenue, would not by itself...

  9. Deduction u/s 37(1) - Nature of payment - Whether shaman shulk paid to Excise Department is penal in nature - The amount cannot be treated to be penalty, which can be...

  10. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 35 - AO has not brought out his case as to why penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates