Addition u/s 69C - unexplained purchases calculated on the basis ...

Income Tax

December 18, 2019

Addition u/s 69C - unexplained purchases calculated on the basis of peak credit - The transactions reported by the assessee from the tainted supplier and the payment through banking channels could not be held to be more than paper transactions.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s 69C - unexplained purchases calculated on the basis ...

Income Tax

December 18, 2019

You may also like:

Unexplained credit u/s 68 - peak credit theory - CIT(A) has rightly rejected the claim of the assessee of adopting peak theory for considering unexplained credit - AT

Additions cannot be made u/s 69C of the Act, as unexplained expenditure, towards difference between purchase price found in loose slips and amount recorded in books of account - AT

Addition on the basis of Peak Credit - unexplained credit entries in the bank account - basis of Peak Credit can be adopted to remove the cascading effect of the...

Unexplained purchase u/s 69C - Section 69C clearly refers to the “source of the expenditure” and not to the expenditure itself - AT

Addition made u/s 69C - Unexplained huge expenditure to earn Agriculture income - once the assessee has not made any investment, the addition made u/s 69C of the Act is illegal.

Credit purchases are nothing but expenditure and if sundry credits are not proved by the assessee addition can be made by the AO by resorting to section 69C - HC

Unexplained purchase u/s 69C - addition of the peak of financial transaction - the entries were bereft of reality and are prepared only to escape any negative...

Addition on unexplained cash deposit - source of cash - where no books of accounts are maintained the peak theory is best method to assess the actual income earned from...

Block assessment - seizure of unexplained cash - it would be justifiable to assess the peak credit of deposits as the income of the assessee. - AT

Additions made u/s 69C - unexplained expenditure – Whether the Assessing Officer had acted on conjectures and surmises – Held no, additions confirmed - HC

Quick Updates: