Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2020 Year 2020 This

Imposition of penalty - discrepancy in Form 38, E-Sugam form - ...

VAT and Sales Tax

January 8, 2020

Imposition of penalty - discrepancy in Form 38, E-Sugam form - the Officer managing the Check Post after verifying the goods should have filled up the Column 8 of Form 38 in accordance with the documents and there was no occasion for imposing a penalty as has been done by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commercial Tax Tribunal.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Amendment to Rule 12 and Forms SAHAJ (ITR-1), ITR-2, ITR-3, SUGAM (ITR-4S), ITR-4 AND ITR-V - substituted - Notification

  2. Imposition of penalty under Section 54(1) (14) of UP VAT Act - The Tribunal has only observed that non-filing of various columns in Form 38 indicates that there was...

  3. Imposition of penalty u/s 54(1)(14) of UPVAT - By keeping column 6 of Form 38 blank, such declaration form can be repeatedly used for successive import so as to evade...

  4. Levy of personal penalty - Levy of penalty of ₹ 1 Lakh each on the Managing Director as well as Chief Financial Officer under Section 78A of the Finance Act, 1944...

  5. Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(14) of the UP VAT Act, 2008 - Unfilled (blank) column No.8 of Form 38 - The Tribunal has not correctly applied the law in this regard, as they...

  6. Imposition of penalty - discrepancy in Form 31 - certain columns were left blank - only carrying of Form 31 has been prescribed but there is no mention that all column...

  7. Non-production of ST-38 form – It was not controverted that petitioner was exempted unit – Though there was technical defect in not producing Form ST=38 but there was...

  8. When the disciplinary proceedings against the officers under CCS (CCA) Rules have been dropped, the imposition of penalty against them based on the same charges would...

  9. Penalty u/s 271D - Default u/s 269SS - cash loan(s) availed form its Managing Director in current account - day-to-day emergency expenses - AO directed to examine that...

  10. Bogus LTCG - share price increased multi-fold - Allegation that there is artificial increase by circular trading of shares forming carte - It clearly raises several...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates