Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - At the highest, the ...

Income Tax

February 26, 2020

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - At the highest, the case of the revenue was that even though the material was disclosed by the assessee but he had claimed certain inadmissible expenses. Claiming of an expense which is not sustainable in itself cannot be a ground for invoking Section 271(1)(c) of the Act - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - At the highest, the ...

Income Tax

February 26, 2020

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - Defective notice - non specification of charge - ITAT rightly set-aside the order of the penalty levied on the Assessee.

Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - defective notice - it would be too technical and pedantic to take the view that because in the printed notice the inapplicable portion...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) deleted – the act of the assessee was bonafide even though the assessee may have failed to substantiate its claim that the amount was capital receipt - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Mandation of specification of charge - It is clear that for the AO to assume jurisdiction u/s 271(1)(c), proper notice is necessary and the...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - non specification of charge - Assessing Officer has issued a vague and defective notice under section 274 r.w.s....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - The notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(l)(c) of the Act were issued without striking off the irrelevant portion of the limb...

Penalty u/s 271 - Defective notice - the allegation should be specific and clear in the penalty notice also because the assessee has to submit reply in the course of...

Penalty u/s 271 - validity of assessment proceedings can be looked into during the penalty proceedings even though the assessment itself has not been challenged by the assessee.

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - in the assessment order, AO has made it clear that penalty proceedings are initiated separately for furnishing...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Tribunal proceeded on hyper- technicalities and acted as though every seizure must entail initiation of proceedings u/s 271 of the Act - no penalty - HC

Quick Updates: