Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Being unaware, the ex- Directors did not ...

Income Tax

March 14, 2020

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Being unaware, the ex- Directors did not represent the matters either in quantum proceedings or in penalty proceedings. - The present Directors of the assessee-company has faced financial difficulties and labour unrest, and the same is evident from the documents produced before the Tribunal - CIT(A) directed adjudicate the matter - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Being unaware, the ex- Directors did not ...

Income Tax

March 14, 2020

You may also like:

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Failure of the assessee to explain the source of cash deposit in the bank account - burden of proof - The ITAT acknowledged the...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Basis adopted during the assessment proceedings cannot be used in the penalty proceedings without following the due process. As such, to...

Levy of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) in case of voluntary surrender of income - disallowance of claim of loss - Assessee offered the loss voluntarily to avoid litigation and...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - As the penalty proceedings are distinct and independent to the quantum proceedings, in our considered view, penalty cannot be levied merely on...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - It cannot be said that assessee has concealed the particular income with the meaning of section 271(1)(c) of the Act or there is not deep...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Any addition/disallowances made during the quantum proceedings does not automatically justify the levy of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) -...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Scope of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act cannot be widened later to include within its scope such additions which were not...

Levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - since no specific satisfaction has been recorded by the Ld. Assessing Officer either in the body of the assessment order or in the show...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) - The Tribunal noted that in a previous round of proceedings, a penalty under section 271(1)(b) of...

Initiation of penalty proceeding u/s 271(1)(c) - ndisclosed income as referred under sub-Section 1 of Section 271AAA - Impugned penalty proceeding has been initiated and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

Penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(b) - non compliance of notice issued u/s. 142(1) - addition on account of cash deposits - where all the bank accounts are in the joint name...

Quick Updates: