Validity of Proceeding u/s 158BC - satisfaction was not recorded ...

Income Tax

May 25, 2020

Validity of Proceeding u/s 158BC - satisfaction was not recorded before completion of assessment proceeding - the order passed by the AO as well as the CIT (Appeals) has been set aside by the Tribunal merely on the ground that the satisfaction has not been recorded before completion of the assessment proceedings. The aforesaid finding is contrary to law laid down by the Apex Court.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of Proceeding u/s 158BC - satisfaction was not recorded ...

Income Tax

May 25, 2020

You may also like:

Block Assessment - Requirement to record the satisfaction – Proceeding u/s 153A & 153C versus 158BC, 158BD - The provisions of Section 158BD are pari materia with the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - recording of satisfaction - mere direction in the assessment order to initiate penalty proceedings - Concealment/furnishing inaccurate...

Validity of reopening of assessment - proceeding u/s 147 initiated on the basis of satisfaction note recorded u/s 153C - curable defect u/s 292B - not challenging before...

Validity of Garnishee order - the respondents could not have, willy-nilly, passed the garnishee orders without first passing an assessment order - garnishee order set aside - HC

Re opening of assessment second time - it is only to circumvent the illegality committed by the AO in the fist assessment proceedings - proceedings dropped - AT

Validity of Initiation of proceedings u/s 153C - as argued satisfaction note of the searched person and satisfaction note of the petitioner (other than the searched...

Validity of assessment u/s 158BC r.w.s. 158D - The satisfaction recorded by the AO as per Revenue is incorporated in the order sheet and not in the notice. Thus, it is...

Block assessment - The notice u/s 158BC was issued by AO on 5th May, 2000, which was served on 08th May, 2000. The time limit for passing assessment for Block Period was...

Where CIT(A) and ITAT had set aside the orders, AO can pass fresh orders -Restored the matter to the Assessing Officer to proceed afresh and in accordance with law - HC

The view taken by the AO in computing book profit u/s 115JB being an acceptable view, the assessment order passed cannot be considered to be erroneous - revision set aside - AT

Quick Updates: