Penalty u/s. 271D - violation of section 269SS - father using ...

Income Tax

July 17, 2020

Penalty u/s. 271D - violation of section 269SS - father using the money of his son - the money has been given by the son to the father and that have been used by the father for tiding over urgent business requirement cannot be termed as loan/advance, so it cannot attract the penalty u/s. 271D.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s. 271D - violation of section 269SS - father using ...

Income Tax

July 17, 2020

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271D - default u/s 269SS - assessee has taken loan from his father and paternal aunt, who are family members and such transactions would not attract penalty u/s 271D

Penalty u/s 271D - Default u/s 269SS - loans in question were received by the assessee in cash from her daughter and son-in-law - no penalty leviable

Penalty u/s. 271D - cash receipt in violation of conditions of section 269SS - The transaction was between a father and son, to meet the urgent requirement of depositing...

Penalty u/s 271D - Acceptance of loan in Cash by the appellant firm from its agriculturist customer - violation of provisions of section 269SS - penalty confirmed - HC

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of Section 269SS ranged from just 1.1% to 6.14% for the years under appeal - no penalty - HC

Violation of section 269SS and 269T - cheque discounting business - The assessee had to discount the cheque for cash - There was no question of levying any penalty under...

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of provisions u/s 269SS - cash receipt claimed as advance against sales - recording of the satisfaction by the AO is sine qua non for...

Penalty u/s 271D - accepting cash loan of Rs. 2 lakh in aggregate without any reasonable cause in contravention to section 269SS - transactions between father and son,...

Penalty u/s 271D and 271E - the transaction between son and father and wife and husband, for giving a support and help, in law, is not a loan or deposit in stricter...

Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - default committed in violation of section 269SS & 269T - Reliance on search proceeding documents - Transactions being mere book entries -...

Quick Updates: