Register Price / Packages DEMO Option My Bookmarks Daily Newsletters Feedback/ Suggestions
Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes
TMI - e-Newsletter     TaxTMI    Validity of Faceless assessment u/s 144 r.w.s.144B...     TaxTMI    SEZ unit - Legal services - liability pay tax under...     TaxTMI    Constitutional Validity of Sections 2, 9, 12 and 18...     TaxTMI    Validity of impugned order u/s 73 of the CGST Act -...     TaxTMI    Scope and Interpretation of Contract - Seeking...     TaxTMI    Doctrine of Merger of High Court Decision with the...     TaxTMI    Release of seized goods - The appellants argued...     TaxTMI    Validity Of order passed without signed by the...     TaxTMI    Seeking renewal of registration of Goods Service...     TaxTMI    Rectification u/s 154 - The Assessee argued that...     TaxTMI    Seeking rectification in Form GSTR-1 - limitation...     TaxTMI    Penalty for Non-filing of monthly return - Seeking...     TaxTMI    Detention of the goods and vehicle - stock transfer...     TaxTMI    Validity Of Order passed u/s 73 - Denial of ITC...     TaxTMI    Validity Of Order passed u/s 73 - cryptic order -...     TaxTMI    Latest Case-Laws     TaxTMI    Latest Notifications + Circulars     TaxTMI    GST Council Decisions     TaxTMI       Right Stop
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Companies Law - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2020 Year 2020 This

Oppression and Mismanagement - bogus transactions - siphoning of ...

Companies Law

August 26, 2020

Oppression and Mismanagement - bogus transactions - siphoning of funds - The allegation is an isolated incident and in order to invoke provisions of Oppression and Mismanagement the acts of oppression must be harsh and wrongful. An isolated incident may not be enough for grant of relief and continuous course of oppressive conduct on the part of the majority shareholders is, thus, necessary to be proved. - AT

View Source

 

← Previous Next →

 

You may also like:

  1. Oppression and Mismanagement - increase in the paid-up capital from Rs.1 crore to Rs.2 crores in the Extraordinary General Body Meeting - Allegation of fraudulent...

  2. Oppression and Mismanagement - inherent powers of NCLT to cause audit of accounts - allegations of siphoning funds, breach of agreements, and failure to maintain proper...

  3. Oppression and Mismanagement - illegal allotment of shares - the allegations that there has been an illegal allotment of Petitioner's shares, exclusion of Petitioner...

  4. As a whole, as discussed above, we find no financial mismanagement with malafide intention of siphoning off company's funds - But certainly, if examined cumulatively in...

  5. Oppression and mismanagement - the Tribunal has the power to make Interim Orders which it thinks fit for regulation of the conduct of the affairs of the Company -...

  6. Oppression and Mismanagement - This ‘Tribunal’ keeping in mind of the ingredients of Section 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 comes to a resultant conclusion that...

  7. Oppression and mismanagement - Removal of Director - Period of limitation - Time gap of 5 years - The petition filed by the petitioner is prima facie barred by...

  8. Oppression and mismanagement - Holding BOD meetings outside India - Nothing is shown that there is any restriction on the place where Board of Directors should hold...

  9. Oppression and mismanagement - misappropriation of funds - as such no irregularities were found in convening an Extra-Ordinary General Meeting which was requisitioned at...

  10. An examination of the terms of "Oppression and Mismanagement" under the Companies Act, 1956 and 2013. - Notes

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates

What's New:
    Latest Case Laws
What's New:
    Latest Notifications
What's New:
    Latest Circulars
C: Framework for Category I and II Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) to...
C: Flexibility to Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) and their investors...
N: Securities Contracts (Regulation) (Stock Exchanges and Clearing Corpor...
N: Securities and Exchange Board of India (Research Analysts) (Amendment)...
F: Sec 16(4) Reversal of ITC when 3B is filed belatedly
N: Securities and Exchange Board of India (Investment Advisers) (Amendmen...
C: Limits for investment in debt and sale of Credit Default Swaps by Fore...
N: Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority for the purpose of adjudi...
A: WRONG FIXATION OF FEES PAYABLE TO INTERIM RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL
A: MANNER OF FILING APPEAL BY COMMISSIONER
A: Recovery proceedings not to be initiated against the former director o...
H: Penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(b) - non-compliance with the 3 notices...
H: Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reason to believe - Addi...
H: Rejecting registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) - name mismatch between the...
H: Denial of benefit u/s 115BAA of reduced rate of tax @22% - Domestic Co...
H: Prohibition of Benami Transactions - Provisional attachment order was ...
H: Maintainability of Appeal - Appropriate forum - matter relates to the ...
H: Seeking amendment of bill of entry - The High Court acknowledged the o...
H: Request for conversion of free Shipping Bills into Drawback Shipping B...
H: Provisional release of the goods allowed - SCN not issued within time ...
H: 100% EOU - Cancellation of bonded warehouse licence, letter of permiss...
H: Refund of Service Tax - Payment of tax as a mistake of law - Period of...
H: Service Tax Liability - Valuation - Reimbursements of expenses - Pure ...
H: Levy of penalty - Applicability of the substituted rule for imposition...
H: Interest and penalty liability - Petitioner discharged GST liability b...
H: Imposition of 100% penalty - Late Filing of Writ Petition - Petitioner...
A: A simplified GST guide designed for commission agents and brokers.
A: Delhi HC issued notice to decide on the taxability of providing corpor...
A: WAIVER OF INTREST UNDER SECTION 234A, 234B AND 234C OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961
A: Rs. 3731 Crore Penalty Demand from the employees set aside