Computation of MAT u/s 115JB - Book Profit - Long term capital ...

Income Tax

September 3, 2020

Computation of MAT u/s 115JB - Book Profit - Long term capital gains - There is no provision in the Act to prevent the assessee from claiming indexed cost of acquisition on the sale of asset in case, where the assessee is subjected to Section 115JB - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Computation of MAT u/s 115JB - Book Profit - Long term capital ...

Income Tax

September 3, 2020

You may also like:

MAT - Long term capital gain from sale of shares to be shown to the book profits u/s 115JB - AT

MAT u/s 115JB - assessee is entitled to reduce an amount on account of withdrawal from the provision for ESOP from the taxable book profit in the working of MAT - AT

MAT computation - exclusion of income of SEZ unit while computing Book Profit u/s 115JB - book profit computed under section 115JB will not include income of SEZ Unit - AT

Minimum alternate tax (MAT) - profit from sale of agricultural land, which is not a “Capital Asset”, cannot be included for the purpose of computing book profit u/s 115JB - AT

Base year for considering cost of inflation index (CII) for computing long term capital gain on inheritance of property - it should be the date when previous owner...

MAT - Provision for bad and doubtful debts are required to be added to book profit as per clause (i) of explanation [1] to subsection [2] of section 115JB - AT

MAT computation - assessee’s interest income and profit on sale of Mutual Funds would not form part of the computation of ‘book profits’ u/s 115JB - AT

Long Term Capital Gain - assessee executed a release deed of property - when undisputedly, there is no cost of acquisition to assessee, the computation provision fails,...

Adding back transfer pricing adjustment to income assessed u/s 115JB (MAT) - AO erred in adding back the transfer pricing adjustment of the book profits u/s 115JB - AT

MAT - Addition of Book Profits u/s 115JB – Dividend Stripping u/s 94(7) - The Explanation (f) of Section 115JB was clearly applicable in case of the appellant - AT

Quick Updates: