Revision u/s 263 - Clearly, what was being directed by the ...

Income Tax

December 31, 2020

Revision u/s 263 - Clearly, what was being directed by the learned Commissioner was already done by the Assessing Officer, and, therefore, these directions clearly show that there was a clear and glaring non- application of mind to even undisputed material facts of the case. We, therefore, cannot approve justification of the subject assessment order being held to be ‘erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue’ for this reason as well. No other reason is pointed out to us. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - Clearly, what was being directed by the ...

Income Tax

December 31, 2020

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - CIT has merely directed the Assessing Officer to make an elaborate inquiry. - revision is not valid - AT

Revision u/sec. 263 - CIT has exceeded his jurisdiction in directing the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

Revision u/s 263 - Validity of proceedings – CIT has no jurisdiction to direct the Assessing Officer to initiate proceedings u/s 201(1A) - AT

Revision u/s 263 - addition u/s 68 - The Assessing Officer has taken a possible view. When the Assessing Officer follows the direction of the Ld. Pr. CIT, in his order...

Revision u/s 263 - assessment order passed u/s 153A r.w.s 143(3) - no any incriminating material unearthed by search team therefore Assessing Officer’s order is not erroneous.

Revision u/s 263 - assessment order as contrary to the draft assessment order - The remedy against unjust disallowances, on merits, lies in the appellate process and not...

Revision u/s 263 - assessee has made purchases in cash - when the learned assessing officer was not required to enquire on those issues such as purchases in cash more...

Revision u/s 263 - Explanation 2 to section 263 (Deeming erroneous order) is applicable only when there is no enquiry made by the Assessing Officer.

Revision u/s 263 - unaccounted interest payments - the Commissioner of Income Tax cannot find fault and he cannot impose his view on the Assessing Officer - AT

Revision u/s 263 - entire materials on record were not considered by the Assessing Officer - It would have definitely be an erroneous procedure adopted by the AO - HC

Quick Updates: