Denial of deduction u/s 35AC on the basis of statement of ...

Income Tax

January 30, 2021

Denial of deduction u/s 35AC on the basis of statement of Trustee - AO ought to have provided material used against the assessee apart from providing an opportunity to cross examine deponent whose statement was used against the assessee. Besides the said statement there is no substantive material to disbelieve the claim of assessee. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Denial of deduction u/s 35AC on the basis of statement of ...

Income Tax

January 30, 2021

You may also like:

Clandestine removal - merely on the basis of statement of employees it cannot be concluded that the imported raw material has not been used in manufacture by the Appellant.

Use of materials seized and the statement furnished by the third parties against the assessee - the opportunity for the rebuttal to the assessee for the seized documents...

Reopening of assessment - bogus purchases - When the assessee has subsequently requested the AO to provide an opportunity to cross examine the person, whose statement is...

Deduction u/s 54 - assessee has utilized other funds (apart from sale consideration) for constructing residential house and for this reason only he cannot be denied...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reasons were recorded on receipt of information from Investigation Wing - Apart from this information, which has been taken as gospel...

New Notification u/s 35AC – various Eligible Projects or Scheme

Imposition of penalties - Apart from the statement there are ample documentary evidences which clearly establish that appellants were involved in aiding and abetting...

Valuation - service charges - includibility - these services were provided by the assessee apart from the manufacture and sale of goods at the factory gate and therefore...

Addition u/s 69 - addition based on the estimation of the cost of acquisition of the property - The ITAT observed that the AO had relied heavily on statements obtained...

Revisionary powers of Commissioner u/s 263 - contradictory statements - AO did not considered these statements - CIT has remanded back the matter to AO - no prejudice...

Quick Updates: