Reopening of the assessment u/s 147 - excess claim of deduction ...

Income Tax

February 6, 2021

Reopening of the assessment u/s 147 - excess claim of deduction u/s.80JJAA - reopening of assessment is not based on sound footing and hence the impugned assessment order framed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act, is illegal and liable to be quashed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reopening of the assessment u/s 147 - excess claim of deduction ...

Income Tax

February 6, 2021

You may also like:

The vehicle in respect of which assessee seeks to claim depreciation @ 50% is a ‘light motor vehicle’ and therefore the claim for enhanced rate of depreciation is on a...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - excess claim of Deduction u/s 10B - The case of the respondent (Revenue) is that the petitioner was in the habit of making an excess...

Deduction u/s 80JJA - cutting and polishing of diamond is a manufacturing or production of article or thing for claiming deduction u/s 80JJAA of the Act - AT

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reason to believe - there was tangible material before the AO to reopen the concluded assessment as the assessee is claiming huge...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - claim of deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) - provision for Non-Performing Advances as per the RBI Regulations - The court observed that the...

Deduction u/s 80P - reopening of assessment u/s 147 - notices kept in abeyance subject to the outcome of the the Apex Court in the SLP

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - deduction u/s. 801A/IB - reassessment framed by the AO is bad in law for the three reasons.

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reopening based on audit objections - reasons to believe - High Court observed that, reopening an assessment beyond four years requires...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - excess weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) - JAO has grossly erred in alleging in the reasons recorded for reopening that...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - bogus purchases - to what exact income had escaped assessment may be open for argument, nevertheless, would not be a ground to quash...

Quick Updates: