Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there is small difference between 26AS ...

Income Tax

February 27, 2021

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there is small difference between 26AS and income returned. This is also very minor and the assessee does not deserve to be visited with the rigour of penalty. We are of the considered opinion that assessee's conduct is not contumacious and his claims are not mala fide. Hence, assessee should not be visited with rigour of penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there is small difference between 26AS ...

Income Tax

February 27, 2021

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - surrender was not voluntary - assessee failed to explain the difference between the assessed income and returned income - penalty confirmed - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Minor differences in estimation and consequent valuation are but natural and so long as fundamental methodology so adopted by the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Additions based on difference in TDS statement (Form 26AS) - assessee failed to submit reconciliation between the books of account and Form 26AS...

Penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) - revised return filed - assessee has adopted the recourse of avoiding litigation, therefore, revised the return to buy peace of mind - no...

Salary income - additions towards difference between returned income and as per 26AS - there was dispute between employee and employer therefore, it was necessary for...

Difference of TDS as per 26AS and TDS as declared in Return of Income (ROI) - AO failed to make inquiries - revision order u/s 263 is valid - AT

Penalty being 300% by invoking Section 271(1)(c) - return was revised before completion of assessment - Revenue is not justified in imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - excessive retainership expenses and not supported by the evidences and difference in the income as per TDS claimed in return of income and 26AS -...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act - difference of opinion with regard to the nature of expenditure would not amount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) imposed on minor - The tribunal upheld the appellant's argument regarding being a minor, stating that penalty proceedings initiated against a minor...

Quick Updates: