Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) has given direction to the ...

CIT(A) Oversteps: Cannot Direct Assessing Officer on Penalties; Income Estimation Alone Insufficient for Penalty u/s 271(1)(c.

July 13, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) has given direction to the Assessing Officer to levy penalty equivalent to 100% tax under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere estimate of income cannot fasten liability upon the assessee u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act. - it is settled law that learned CIT(A) has no power whatsoever to remit the matter to the Assessing Officer to pass a penalty order as per his direction. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) has given direction to the ...

CIT(A) Oversteps: Cannot Direct Assessing Officer on Penalties; Income Estimation Alone Insufficient for Penalty u/s 271(1)(c.

July 13, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 270A was imposed by disallowing 30% of indexed cost of development expenses concerning Long Term Capital Gain offered by the assessee due to failure to...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee's appeal and directed the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act to be deleted. The Assessing Officer...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the appellant, during reassessment proceedings, had filed their return of income but failed to provide...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) involved an addition based on estimation by the Assessing Officer, which was later re-estimated by the CIT(A) to disallow 10% of the...

Estimation of income - On Money - Unaccounted on money receipt from the real estate project - the assessing officer being investigator and adjudicator was under...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer cannot arbitrarily reduce agricultural income and add it as income from other sources based on mere...

The assessee, a company engaged in development/construction and sale of flats and plots, had classified its properties into four categories: flats open for sale, let-out...

Revision u/s 263 - merger of the order - the entire issue of limited scrutiny, reasons for selection, the Bank accounts in questions were before the ld. Pr. CIT. On this...

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The appellant contended that the addition made by the Assessing Officer was based solely on estimations, making it ineligible for...

The crux pertains to levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged furnishing of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income regarding capital gains computation on sale...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - Disallowance of provision for ex-gratia - CIT(A) has provided an opportunity to the assessing officer to examine the mistake committed...

Quick Updates: