Penalty under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act - non-mention of ...

Customs

October 28, 2012

Penalty under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act - non-mention of Section 113 in the show-cause notice would not per se invalidate the penalty imposed under Section 114 if the penalty is otherwise supported by the essential facts alleged and proved - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act - non-mention of ...

Customs

October 28, 2012

You may also like:

DEPB license obtained through fraudulent means - the appellants have knowingly committed offence as specified under Section 113(i) and made themselves liable for penalty...

Whether the provisions of sections 113(d) and 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 are invocable in the case of export under Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) scheme or not - ...

Levy of penalty u/s 114(iii) and 114AA of the Customs Act - respondents categorically stated that only the corrigendum was served on them without the show cause notice -...

Levy of penalty u/s 114 - attempt to export of red sanders whose export is prohibited unless one has a licence - There was a gross negligence on the part of the...

Levy of penalty u/s 114 - The discretion of levying penalty is always available with the Statutory Authority under Section 114, whenever such an Authority is of the view...

CENVAT Credit - Penalty - even though the amount is paid before issuance of show cause notice as per the proviso to Section 11A invoked, penalty cannot be reduced nor waived.

Penalty - payment of service tax before issuance of show cause notice (SCN) - it is evident that he has paid the amount only after the issuance of show cause notice -...

Penalty - non-payment of service tax – Appellants paid the Service Tax promptly as soon as it was pointed out before issue of show cause notice and taking registration...

Valuation of export goods - overvaluation - a careful reading of the orders of the lower adjudicating authorities indicate that there is mis-declaration of the value of...

Re-fixation of taxable turnover – Non existant concern - the explanation offered by the assessee was disbelieved and rejected, per se would not lead to imposition of penalty - HC

Quick Updates: