Addition u/s 69C - unexplained expenditure - Since the assessee ...

Income Tax

September 21, 2021

Addition u/s 69C - unexplained expenditure - Since the assessee purchased the stamp and made the payment through RTGS then there is no question of considering the same has unexplained investment - AO issued the summon u/s 131 of The Act to the stamp vendor and by issuing the summon, the stamp vendor becomes the witness of the Revenue and thus, it was the duty of the Assessing Officer to collect the information from the stamp vendor and confront to the assessee but the AO failed to gather the information. - No additions - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s 69C - unexplained expenditure - Since the assessee ...

Income Tax

September 21, 2021

You may also like:

Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - expenditure of stamp duty paid for registration of property sold - additions confirmed - HC

Addition made u/s 69C - Unexplained huge expenditure to earn Agriculture income - once the assessee has not made any investment, the addition made u/s 69C of the Act is illegal.

Additions cannot be made u/s 69C of the Act, as unexplained expenditure, towards difference between purchase price found in loose slips and amount recorded in books of account - AT

Unexplained purchase u/s 69C - Section 69C clearly refers to the “source of the expenditure” and not to the expenditure itself - AT

Additions made u/s 69C - unexplained expenditure – Whether the Assessing Officer had acted on conjectures and surmises – Held no, additions confirmed - HC

Addition u/s 69C – Unexplained expenditure - only because parties has given a different accounting treatment in its books of account, it cannot be said that the assessee...

Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - once estimation of GP has been made on the unaccounted sales it covers unexplained expenditure also to this extent - AT

Credit purchases are nothing but expenditure and if sundry credits are not proved by the assessee addition can be made by the AO by resorting to section 69C - HC

Unexplained expenditure u/s. 69C - CIT(A) held that the AO was not justified in assuming that the assessee had made unaccounted purchases solitary on the basis that the...

Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - genuineness of purchases - Assessee statedly had made purchases from the three parties - Payments made through banking channels -...

Quick Updates: