Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2021 Year 2021 This

Penalty u/s. 271G - assessee did not provide any basis for ...

Income Tax

October 5, 2021

Penalty u/s. 271G - assessee did not provide any basis for comparing the transactions and it failed to provide any alternative method to benchmark the transactions which had prevented determination of ALP of these transactions - considering the practical difficulties in furnishing the segment wise details of AE segment and non-AE segment transactions in diamond industry, no penalty under Sec. 271G could justifiably be imposed for failure to furnish the said information - we confirm the impugned order deleting the penalty u/s 271G - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271G – Failure to maintain documents and accounts being audited - AO should have initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271AA/271BA – the penalty levied u/s 271G...

  2. Penalty u/s 271G - assessee failed to furnish documents as required under the Rule 10D(1) in respect of the international transactions - considering the reasonable cause...

  3. Penalty levied u/s. 271G - nternational transactions - assessee ignoring the provisions of Section 92D of the Act as well as Rule 10D of the Income Tax Rules - Section...

  4. Penalty levied u/s 271G - Assessee has failed to maintain the information as per Rule 10D (1) (d), (g), (h) and (m) of Income Tax Rules - ‘reaso-nable cause’ under...

  5. Penalty u/s 271G - non-furnishing’ TP Study Report’ which is not a specified document under Rule 10D - penalty deleted - AT

  6. Penalty u/s 271G - assessee applied TNMM for determining of ALP - information/documents sought for determining of ALP as per CUP method - the difficulty in maintaining...

  7. Penalty u/s 271AA - failure of the assessee to report the intentional transactions - As seen that the AO wrongly applied the amended Section 271AA which is effective...

  8. Penalty u/s 271G - international transactions with its AE of import of rough diamonds which were sold to the third parties - once the TPO has accepted the bench marking...

  9. TP adjustment - MAM selection - method used for benchmarking the royalty transaction - It may be true that the assessee aggregated payment of royalty with the...

  10. Disallowance on an ad-hoc basis - in the absence of necessary documentary evidence the AO had no alternative except to make the disallowance on an ad-hoc basis.

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates