Refund of excess amount lying to the credit of electronic cash ...

Petitioner's GST Refund Valid Under Proviso to Section 54(1), Not u/s 52, Respondent's Argument Incorrect.

November 3, 2021

Case Laws GST HC

Refund of excess amount lying to the credit of electronic cash ledger of the petitioner - applicability of proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 54 or sub-section (1) of Section 54 - the stand of the respondents that since the amount collected by ECO under Section 52 of the CGST Act is not paid by the petitioner by himself and therefore, it is not entitled to claim refund of the same, is totally misplaced. As the petitioner is claiming refund balance in electronic cash ledger, it is covered by the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 54 and would not fall under sub-section (1) of Section 54. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of excess amount lying to the credit of electronic cash ...

Petitioner's GST Refund Valid Under Proviso to Section 54(1), Not u/s 52, Respondent's Argument Incorrect.

November 3, 2021

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Entitlement for refund of input credit in cash, which was neither transitioned in accordance with TRAN-1 (GST) procedure into the new regime nor got reflected in the...

HC directed state authorities to process petitioner's GST refund claim promptly following verification of facts and entitlement. Decision must consider state...

Migration of TDS Credit from VAT to GST - Transitional provisions - the stand of the Respondents is self-destructive, as if the Petitioners are not allowed to migrate...

Seeking GST registration to be effective from retrospective effect i.e. 1.7.2017 - Migration from erstwhile tax laws to GST - Bonafide error in making application - The...

Refund of GST paid deposited by the Vendor on advance paid by the appellant since no supply was made - Return/refund of the entire advance amount - The High Court found...

HC determined that holographic stickers supplied by the Prohibition and Excise Department constitute "goods" under Section 2(52) of GST laws, not services. The supply...

Rectification of mistake in GSTR-1 return - Details of export supplies are also to be furnished in Form GSTR-1 - the time of revising the Form GSTR-1 got expired on...

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

Filing of form GST TRAN-1 - transitional credit - The petitioner is entitled to get one more chance to submit the declaration in Form GST TRAN-1 as the petitioner could...

Doctrine of promissory estoppel - Impact of migration to GST from erstwhile area back exemption / incentive scheme in Central Excise - the Excise duty Exemptions availed...

Filing of Form TRAN-1 - transitional credit - petitioner has committed mistake due to technical/system error and has failed in filing /uploading a declaration...

Refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit - rejection of refund on the ground that credit was transferred to GST regime through TRAN-1 - it is not a case that the appellant has...

Non-service of detailed SCN - Validity of Summary show cause in Form GST DRC-01 - The contents of the said Summary show cause in Form GST DRC-01, dated 20.12.2018, does...

HC addressed payment procedures for GST demands under rule 142. Petitioner paid demand through Form GST DRC-03 instead of required electronic liability register Form GST...

The HC disposed of the petition directing State Authorities to immediately process the petitioner's GST refund claim after verification of facts and entitlement. The...

Quick Updates: