Residential status of assessee - The claim of the petitioner is ...

Income Tax

December 17, 2021

Residential status of assessee - The claim of the petitioner is totally misfound. The objective of the Treaty is to avoid double taxation and not to avoid taxation. In order to claim benefit in India, the petitioner has to provide TRC from the Government of USA which admittedly he does not possess. Case of the petitioner in our view is hit by Section 90(4) of the 1961 Act which contemplates that a non-resident assessee claiming benefit under the double taxation avoidance agreement is not entitled for such benefit unless the said assessee obtains TRC from the country of which he is resident. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Residential status of assessee - The claim of the petitioner is ...

Income Tax

December 17, 2021

You may also like:

Treaty benefits - ‘gains from alienation of shares' - taxability or otherwise of capital gain from sale of equity shares under Article 13(4) of India-Mauritius DTAA -...

Taxability of capital gain arising on sale of shares under the treaty provisions - AO and DRP have rejected assessee’s claim by holding that assessee being a mere paper...

Residential status of the assessee - period of stay in India - whether the term “employment outside India” includes “doing Business”? - even if the assessee went to...

Determination of residential status of assessee - Relaxation of period of 60 days as per section 6(1)(a) to 182 days when employment is taken outside India as per clause...

Validity of Proceedings u/s 144C - Eligible assessee - Original ITR filed declaring the status as "Resident" - In the revised ITR the status declared as "Non-Resident" -...

Computing value of perquisites u/s 17(2) - residential accommodation - Merely because assessee is a body or undertaking owned or controlled by the Central Government, it...

Income accrued in India - Permanent Establishment (PE) in India under Article–5 of the India–Mauritius Tax Treaty - The two companies were not exclusively working for...

Exemption u/s 54 - no documentary evidence to substantiate the claim that any amount was invested for purchase of new residential house except a certificate of builder...

Deduction u/s 54 - LTCG invested in buying two residential units - the assessee would only entitle to the benefit of section 54, 1) if the assessee invested the LTCG...

Status of HUF - whether CIT(A) erred in granting the assessee the status HUF & deleting the addition made being the capital asset treated as income of AOP - held no - AT

Quick Updates: