Validity of Settlement Commission order - by virtue of Section ...

Income Tax

December 24, 2021

Validity of Settlement Commission order - by virtue of Section 132 (4A), Section 56 (2) (vii) and Section 292 (C), the presumption in law arose as a consequence of the action/inaction of the third party in not claiming the cash seized at the petitioner’s hands as may be treated as her income. Without drawing any final conclusion to that, we find that the said aspect has not been examined and has been completely overlooked by the Settlement Commission. - The approach taken by the Settlement Commission cannot be endorsed or appreciated. It is expected from the Settlement Commission to form clear opinion on facts, even at the stage of admission. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of Settlement Commission order - by virtue of Section ...

Income Tax

December 24, 2021

You may also like:

Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) - FMV of property - The events subsequent to the transaction of “transfer” of the immovable property under consideration will have no...

Addition u/s 56(2)(vii) - relevant Section 50C cannot be invoked as the said section is applicable in the case of seller of the property only while the appellant is a...

Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) - Purchase of property below circle rate / stamp value - since the assessee/co-owners has made part payment (part consideration of Rs. 3...

Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) - AO referred the valuation of property to Valuation Cell and DVO - difference between the DVO value and consideration paid for purchase of...

Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) - valuation of land purchased by assessee - deemed gift under section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) - Assessee submitted that, actual deed could not be...

Deemed income from purchase of shares - purchases at lower price than FMV - addition u/s 69 OR u/s 56 (2)(vii)(C) - asset that has been transferred in this transaction...

Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(c) - related person - allotment of equity shares @ Rs. 10/- - book value of shares prior to allotment worked out at Rs. 552/- per share - the...

Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) - purchase of immovable property on less than stamp duty value - it was incumbent upon the AO to refer the matter to the District Valuation Officer

Accommodation of bogus transaction - entry operator - Presumption of Section 132(4A) stood against the assessee - complete onus to negate the same was on assessee which...

In the light of the presumption under section 132(4A), the assessee ought to have produced other documents to disprove the entries made in the loose sheets - HC

Quick Updates: