Validity of Direction to place Settlement Proposal, sent by ...

Insolvency and Bankruptcy

January 31, 2022

Validity of Direction to place Settlement Proposal, sent by Respondent No. 1 before the CoC for its consideration - Considering the ratio of the Judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ebix Singapore, "there was no scope for negotiations between the parties once the CoC has approved the Resolution Plan. Thus, contractual principles and common law remedies, which do not find a rope in the wording or the intent of the IBC, cannot be imported in the intervening period between the acceptance of the CoC Approved Resolution Plan and the Approval by the Adjudicating Authority. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of Direction to place Settlement Proposal, sent by ...

Insolvency and Bankruptcy

January 31, 2022

You may also like:

Prayer for direction for placing the Settlement Proposal submitted by the Appellant before the CoC for consideration - CoC unanimously decided to reject the proposal...

Approval of the Resolution Plan - Appellant (Successful Resolution Applicant - SRA) submits that after approval of Resolution Plan of the Appellant by the CoC, there was...

Seeking withdrawal of application u/s 12A of IBC - Commercial wisdom of COC - Appellant who was representing the Corporate Debtor and has submitted the Settlement...

Settlement proposal under Section 12A of IBS - Resolution Plan already approved by the Coc - The Adjudicating Authority committed error in giving an opportunity to...

Request for closer of CIRP - 88% shareholders ready to provide funds and repay the debts - Rejection of the proposal of the shareholders / corporate debtors - The...

Validity of directions issued by the NCLT after permitting the withdrawal of application - Direction to deposit the unpaid TDS amount, deducted from the employees -...

CIRP - NCLT admitted the application - settlement entered into by the parties - Any settlement after passing of the impugned order and after constitution of the CoC is...

Bar on application before the settlement commission - scope of the term 'any other matter' u/s 127L - The phrase 'any other matter', in my considered view, would bar an...

Deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) - revenue had not taken any action against the directions of the Tribunal as per the original order, and therefore the directions have...

Transitional credit - Direction to the Opposite Parties to accept the GST TRAN-1 form from the Petitioner - In the present case a direction is issued to the Opposite...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) has given direction to the Assessing Officer to levy penalty equivalent to 100% tax under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere estimate of...

Refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit - rejection of refund on the ground that credit was transferred to GST regime through TRAN-1 - it is not a case that the appellant has...

Consideration of Resolution Plan from Non-Listed Applicants - Authority of CoC to Modify Invitation for Expression of Interest (EOI) - The NCLAT upheld Regulation...

Validity of Settlement Commission Order - when the High Court set aside the order of the Settlement Commission, the matter had to be remanded to the Settlement...

Fresh consideration of resolution plan after a resolution approved by the CoC - Direction given by the NCLAT that Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) to be...

Quick Updates: