Revision u/s 263 - When the provision contained under Section ...

Income Tax

January 31, 2022

Revision u/s 263 - When the provision contained under Section 92CA(4) of the Act makes it mandatory upon the Assessing Officer to compute the total income of the assessee in conformity with the order of the TPO and the Assessing Officer has computed the total income following the statutory mandate, the assessment order cannot be considered to be erroneous. Even, assuming that some prejudice might have been caused to the Revenue, nevertheless the twin conditions of 'erroneous' and 'prejudicial' to the interest of the revenue as provided under section 263(1) of the Act have to be fulfilled to enable the Revisionary Authority to assume jurisdiction under the said provision. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - When the provision contained under Section ...

Income Tax

January 31, 2022

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - CIT has merely directed the Assessing Officer to make an elaborate inquiry. - revision is not valid - AT

Revision u/s 263 - Explanation 2 to section 263 (Deeming erroneous order) is applicable only when there is no enquiry made by the Assessing Officer.

TP - retrospective applicability of sec. 92CA(2B) - powers of assessing officer to make such reference and the powers of TPO to furnish report - decided against the assessee - AT

Revision u/s 263 - Section 145A is a non-obstante provision, which, therefore, is to be necessarily followed for the purpose of returning the income - revision upheld - AT

Revision u/s 263 - assessment order passed u/s 153A r.w.s 143(3) - no any incriminating material unearthed by search team therefore Assessing Officer’s order is not erroneous.

Revision u/sec. 263 - CIT has exceeded his jurisdiction in directing the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

Revision u/s 263 - unaccounted interest payments - the Commissioner of Income Tax cannot find fault and he cannot impose his view on the Assessing Officer - AT

Revision u/s 263 - entire materials on record were not considered by the Assessing Officer - It would have definitely be an erroneous procedure adopted by the AO - HC

Revision u/s 263 - any loss of revenue as a consequence of an order passed by the Assessing Officer cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of revenue - AT

Revision u/s 263 - Validity of proceedings – CIT has no jurisdiction to direct the Assessing Officer to initiate proceedings u/s 201(1A) - AT

Quick Updates: