Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The assessee clearly had a ...

Income Tax

February 2, 2022

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The assessee clearly had a bonafide explanation for not adding the unpaid tax liabilities to its income since it was contesting the very levy of the same before the concerned department. It may be a fit case of making addition of the unpaid liabilities to the income of the assessee. But as far as the levy of penalty is concerned the explanation for not adding back the unpaid liabilities to its income cannot be outrightly rejected as not being bonafide. - No penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The assessee clearly had a ...

Income Tax

February 2, 2022

You may also like:

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - penalty cannot be levied where a bonafide claim of the assessee was rejected by the tax department. - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Explanation is bonafide is, we find, supported by the fact that during assessment proceedings the assessee, realizing his mistake even before...

Penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) - excess expenses disallowed and suppression of receipts - being bonafide mistake in accounting the total contract receipts, no penalty.

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has given sufficient explanation though not found satisfactory by AO - No merit in levying penalty.

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - unexplained cash deposited in bank - revised return of income filled - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) cannot be sustained as the assessee had came...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – assessee has bonafide belief in making the claim that gain arising out of sale of agricultural land is exempt from tax - no penalty - AT

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disclosure of additional income consequent to survey operation - the explanations of the assessee that he has declared additional income...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) deleted – the act of the assessee was bonafide even though the assessee may have failed to substantiate its claim that the amount was capital receipt - HC

Quick Updates: