Revision u/s 263 to impose a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT merely ...

Income Tax

February 21, 2022

Revision u/s 263 to impose a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT merely set aside the assessment order in its entirety and remanded the case for a fresh consideration by the assessing officer - Thus, while issuing the order of assessment the assessing officer was bestowed with all powers as in an original assessment, including the power to express his satisfaction for initiating penalty proceedings. - Writ petition dismissed - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 to impose a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT merely ...

Income Tax

February 21, 2022

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - recording of satisfaction - mere direction in the assessment order to initiate penalty proceedings - Concealment/furnishing inaccurate...

Revision u/s 263 - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) dropped - voluntarily offer certain income in the form of cash deposits/FDRs - a perusal of the ‘order sheet’ noting of the A.O...

Revision u/sec. 263 - CIT has exceeded his jurisdiction in directing the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

Penalty being 300% by invoking Section 271(1)(c) - return was revised before completion of assessment - Revenue is not justified in imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - HC

Revision u/s 263 - AO not initiated Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessment order passed u/s 143(3)is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue - Ld. PCIT was...

Penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - Defective notice - non specification of charge - ITAT rightly set-aside the order of the penalty levied on the Assessee.

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - When the addition was set aside, there was no question of imposition of penalty - HC

Levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - since no specific satisfaction has been recorded by the Ld. Assessing Officer either in the body of the assessment order or in the show...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus claim of deduction under Section 35CCA - penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was rightly imposed - HC

Revision u/s 263 – IT was not justified in setting aside the order and directing for investigating the facts afresh without pointing out any specific fact which required...

Quick Updates: