Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - Unexplained Expenditure on Stamp Duty ...

Income Tax

April 15, 2022

Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - Unexplained Expenditure on Stamp Duty and Registration Charges made out of Undisclosed Income - There was no dishonest intent of the assessee particularly in the given facts and circumstances where the assessee had sufficient income i.e. exceeding the amount invested in purchases of properties. Accordingly, we are of the view that the assessee inadvertently omitted to disclose the impugned cost in the income tax return without having any dishonest intent. Thus in such facts and circumstances, we hold that the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act, is not sustainable. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - Unexplained Expenditure on Stamp Duty ...

Income Tax

April 15, 2022

You may also like:

Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - expenditure of stamp duty paid for registration of property sold - additions confirmed - HC

Addition on account of expenses such as stamp duty, registration fees and other miscellaneous charges - suspicion cannot take the place of proof - claim of exemption allowed - AT

Unexplained investment u/s 69 – Assessee paid up additional stamp duty on valuation - This by itself would not mean that the assessee made any unexplained investment - HC

Refund of stamp duty - Stamp papers purchased for registration of immovable property but the same could not be executed - The denial of refund of the stamp duty...

Nature of stamp duty paid in relation to the leased business premises - Revenue or capital expenditure - lease was for a period of 10 years - The same is not a deferred...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - There is no concrete positive evidence against the assessee exhibiting unexplained investment, except unregistered sale deed, which...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of capital expenditure of Research and Development - The facts material to the computation were not produced - levy of...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(C) - deemed income being loss claimed and disallowed - The AO has also not specified the charge on which penalty is being levied - No penalty - AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – the penalty imposed for disallowing claim of expenditure on foreign education and foreign travelling cannot be upheld - AT

Addition u/s 69C - unexplained expenditure - Since the assessee purchased the stamp and made the payment through RTGS then there is no question of considering the same...

Quick Updates: