Profiteering - Construction service - This Authority lands that ...

GST

August 8, 2022

Profiteering - Construction service - This Authority lands that the Respondent has denied the benefit of ITC to the buyers of his flats/customers in contravention of the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017. The Authority holds that the Respondent has committed an offence by violating the provisions of Section 171 (1) during the period from 01.07.2017 to 31.3.2019, and therefore, he is liable for imposition of penalty under the provisions of Section 171 (3A) of the above Act. - NAPA

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - Construction service - This Authority lands that ...

GST

August 8, 2022

You may also like:

Profiteering - Construction Service supplied by the Respondent - Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate...

Profiteering - Construction services - allegation is that the benefit of ITC not passed to customers/flat buyers/recipients, by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - it is alleged that Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - construction service - Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The Authority finds that, had the Respondent excluded the land...

CENVAT Credit - input service - Tax paid on re-insurance service - credit denied on the ground that reinsurance takes place after the insurance business is effected -...

Profiteering - restaurant service - benefit of reduction of tax from 18% to 5% not passed to customers - applicant could not establish profiteering for want of credible evidence

CENVAT Credit - input services - ‘ventilation stopping area and isolation stopping area’ cannot be called as civil structure, accordingly, CENVAT Credit availed by the...

Refund claim on service tax paid on reverse charge basis denied - the refund of CENVAT Credit on the input service is admissible under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules - AT

Profiteering - Respondent had increased the price of the flat after the introduction of GST - benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) not passed on - the Respondent has...

Profiteering - construction services - The registration and approval of the projects and receipt of the payments had taken place in the post-GST regime and hence, there...

Quick Updates: