Unjust-enrichment - Refund allowed but directed to be deposited ...

Central Excise

August 27, 2022

Unjust-enrichment - Refund allowed but directed to be deposited in the Consumer Welfare Fund of India - o the amount deposited during investigation, basing - The findings of the Commissioner (Appeals) that unless the deposited amount is shown in the Profit & Loss Account of the Appellant as amount receivable, doctrine of unjust enrichment would be established, is erroneous. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Unjust-enrichment - Refund allowed but directed to be deposited ...

Central Excise

August 27, 2022

You may also like:

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Security deposit - amount not to be credited to consumer welfare fund - appellants are eligible for refund of cash security...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Unjust enrichment - Consumer Welfare Fund - refund of cash security which was made in terms of the Board's circular does not attract the provisions unjust enrichment - AT

Refund of service tax paid - unjust enrichment - Tribunal on merit of claim held that no service tax is payable - the adjudicating authority did sanction the refund but...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - amount deposited during investigation - and amount of pre-deposit - Refund allowed - AT

Refund - in case of export of goods, unjust enrichment is not applicable - therefore, refund is not liable to be credited in the Consumer Welfare Fund - AT

Refund of duty - unjust enrichment - Crying fire is of no avail if one cannot show even a streak of smoke - department failed to prove its case of unjust enrichment -...

Refund of deposit - Applicability of Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Unjust enrichment - The factual finding of the tribunal is correct - refund allowed - HC

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Unjust enrichment - during investigation appellant deposited an amount of Rs.18,75,000/- under protest by debit entries in the cenvat credit account - refund allowed - AT

Quick Updates: