Deduction of bad and doubtful debt u/s 36(1)(vii) - Advance ...

Income Tax

August 27, 2022

Deduction of bad and doubtful debt u/s 36(1)(vii) - Advance against the purchase of property - This court is of the opinion that as a proposition of law, that enunciation is unexceptional, since the heads of expenditure that can be claimed as deduction are not exhaustive – which is the precise reason for the existence of Section 37. Therefore, in a given case, if the expenditure relates to business, and the claim for its treatment under other provisions are unsuccessful, application of Section 37 is per se not excluded. - the assessee’s claim for deduction as a bad and doubtful debt could not have been allowed. The findings of the ITAT and the High Court, to the contrary, are therefore, insubstantial and have to be set aside. - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Deduction of bad and doubtful debt u/s 36(1)(vii) - Advance ...

Income Tax

August 27, 2022

You may also like:

Provision for bad and doubtful debts u/s 36(1)(viia) against the advances of rural branches - The circular mentions that the provisions of new clause (viia) of section...

Bad and doubtful debts written off disallowed – provision for bad and doubtful debts cannot be allowed u/s 36(1)(vii) - AT

Allowance of of bad debts - advances given by the assessee had become actually bad - deduction u/s 36(1)(vii) cannot be denied - HC

Advances made to rural branches of bank – Whether deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) can exceed the amount of provision for bad and doubtful debts - Held no - AT

Disallowance of provision for Bad Debt Written off - provision made by the assessee for bad and doubtful debts is only a provision, but not actual written off of bad...

Bad debts versus Provisions for bad and doubtful debts - rural banking - Scope and ambit of the proviso to Section 36(1)(vii) - provisions of Sections 36(1)(vii) and...

Deemed income / addition u/s 41(1) - Recovery of bad debts written off - the bad debts written off did not exceed the credit balance in provision for bad and doubtful...

Deduction towards Provision for bad debts - Addition u/s 36(1)(vii) - The ITAT found that the assessee had made a provision for bad debts but had not actually written...

Assessee is not entitled to deduction of any provision created for bad and doubtful debts, no matter such provision is created based on the prevalent accounting policies...

Bad & doubtful debt or mere Provisions were made - provisions u/s.36(1) (vii) and 36(1) (viia) are separate and independent to each other - CIT(A) has rightly observed...

Quick Updates: