Addition u/s 68 - substantial question of law - The Supreme ...

Income Tax

September 17, 2022

Addition u/s 68 - substantial question of law - The Supreme court has held that, the jurisdiction of the High Court to interfere with the orders passed by the Courts below is confined to hearing on substantial question of law and interference with finding of the fact is not warranted if it involves re-appreciation of evidence. Thus no substantial question of law arises for consideration in the present appeal. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s 68 - substantial question of law - The Supreme ...

Income Tax

September 17, 2022

You may also like:

Hearing of appeal by High Court - appeal heard on merit without framing questions, on the basis of questions of law raised in appeal - The appeals are remanded to the...

Addition u/s 68 - it is contended before AO that advances (cash credit) were made against the purchase of goods - AO and the Appellate Authority have the power of Civil...

Eligibility to deduction u/s 35D to the Bank - High Court should have frame substantial question of law before hearing appeal bipartite - issue remanded to High Court...

Substantial question of law to be made u/s 260A - prerequisite of admission of the appeal before the High court - The ITAT hold that the assessee had correctly offered...

Addition u/s 68 - whether Tribunal is right in law in accepting the contentions of the Assessee without giving an opportunity to the AO by way of a remand - the...

Direction in original appellate proceeding - Not challenged - it cannot now question the findings of the lower appellate authority based on earlier direction - No...

Contempt proceedings - The Tribunal (NCLT) and the Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) have the same ‘jurisdiction’, ‘powers’ and ‘Authority’ in respect of contempt of it as the...

Additions u/s 68 - assessment u/s 153A - substantial question of law - Additions towards investment into share capital on the strength of the documents found at the...

Rectification of mistake - error apparent on the face of record - This Court had interfered with the impugned orders on facts that were peculiar therein or for not...

Penalty u/s 271C -LTA - Mere admission of the appeal by the High Court on the substantial questions of law as have been quoted above, would make it apparent that the...

Quick Updates: