TP adjustment - DRP gave clear directions to the TPO to ...

Income Tax

November 4, 2022

TP adjustment - DRP gave clear directions to the TPO to re-examine the inclusion of comparable - the jurisdictional AO has become functus officio once the final assessment order is passed and that there is no authority for him to pass any order modifying the final assessment order. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

TP adjustment - DRP gave clear directions to the TPO to ...

Income Tax

November 4, 2022

You may also like:

Transfer pricing adjustment - selection of comparable - AO/TPO is directed to work out the ALP of the assessee with direction - AT

Transfer pricing adjustment - selection of comparable - Tribunal specified the aspects that may be kept in mind by the DRP while addressing the objections in respect to...

TP Adjustment - Addition of international transaction related to the demerger - The High court identified a jurisdictional overreach by the AO, who made an adjustment...

TP adjustment - AO/TPO has not followed direction of DRP - As per section 144C(13) the AO is bound to pass the final assessment order in conformity with the direction of...

Adding back transfer pricing adjustment to income assessed u/s 115JB (MAT) - AO erred in adding back the transfer pricing adjustment of the book profits u/s 115JB - AT

Transfer pricing adjustment – export to associated enterprises of spares and components required for the purpose of servicing of vehicles sold by assessee - the...

TP adjustment - Jurisdiction of TPO - TPO suo motu examined the domestic transaction and made transfer pricing adjustment - in relation to a specified domestic...

TP Adjustment - the TPO is erred in adopting CUP method for few transactions when he has accepted overwhelming majority of transactions under TNMM method. The DRP...

TP Adjustment - Rate of interest for the purpose of calculating working capital adjustment - AO/TPO, while giving effect to the directions of the DRP, were bereft of any...

Transfer pricing adjustment - There is no reason why the OECD guidelines should not be taken as a valid input in the present case in judging the action of the TPO - AT

Quick Updates: