Import of goods - infringement of the Intellectual Property ...

Customs

December 17, 2022

Import of goods - infringement of the Intellectual Property Rights of the plaintiffs - eeking impleadment in the present suit as a proper party - Infringement of trade marks - violation of paragraph 2.3 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-20 - in terms of Rule 11 of IPR Enforcement Rules, the applicant cannot go into the question of infringement till the final adjudication of the present suit - The applicant is neither a necessary party nor a proper party for the adjudication of the suit. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Import of goods - infringement of the Intellectual Property ...

Customs

December 17, 2022

You may also like:

Import of services - reverse charge method - it has not been established if the said ‘intellectual property right’ was acknowledged under the relevant Indian law -...

Services of Manpower on cost sharing basis to group companies - Service Tax liability for import of Intellectual Property Rights - matter requires reconsideration -...

Intellectual Property Right Services - the transfer of right is absolutely in terms of the agreement, therefore, proviso Section 65(55)b) of the act are not applicable - AT

Infringement of trademark - defendant's trademark FREEDOM is deceptively similar to that of the plaintiff's trademark FREEMANS - HC

Suspension of clearance of imported goods - Confiscation of goods - Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights - Dy. Commissioner of Customs to pass fresh orders...

Reclaim of goods after surrender of rights in warehoused Goods (after import) u/s 23(3) - Due to increased customs duty, the plaintiffs could not take the delivery of...

Intellectual Property Service (IPR) - import of services - taxability - subject transfers of 'right to intellectual property', if any, covered by those transactions do...

Depreciation disallowed on non-compete fee - an agreement not to compete is purely personal - cannot be considered as the intellectual property right - no depreciation - AT

Intellectual Property Right service - the appellant should deposit the interest because of the delayed payment of service tax to the extent of R&D cess - AT

Demand of service tax - Transfer of intellectual property right - Hdemand under ‘scientific and technical service' is not sustainable hence set aside - AT

Quick Updates: