Bogus transaction in the scrip - bogus LTCG - Onus to prove - ...

Income Tax

January 6, 2023

Bogus transaction in the scrip - bogus LTCG - Onus to prove - Income generated by the assessee cannot be held bogus only on the basis of the modus operandi, generalisation, and assumptions of certain facts. In order to hold income earned or loss incurred by the assessee as bogus, specific evidence has to be brought on record by the Revenue to prove that the assessee was involved in the collusion with the entry operator/stock brokers for such an arrangements. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Bogus transaction in the scrip - bogus LTCG - Onus to prove - ...

Income Tax

January 6, 2023

You may also like:

Bogus LTCG - penny stock - addition u/s 68 - The AO failed to bring on board any material to suggest that the assessee had made cash payment to the purchaser of share...

Bogus LTCG - bogus share transaction - As in so far as cancellation of registration of sub-broker by the NSE through whom the assessee had sold shares of Buniyad...

Bogus LTCG - capital gains arising on sale of shares - We see potency in the plea of the assessee that such capital gains arising on sale of shares cannot be regarded as...

Bogus LTCG - Addition u/s 68 - onus to prove genuineness of the transactions - The whole basis of making additions is third-party statement and no opportunity of...

Addition on account of alleged bogus purchases - The complete onus to prove the genuineness of the purchases was upon assessee and the same, in our opinion, has remained...

Disallowances of bogus trading loss in penny stock as well as commission expenses - admittedly there was no evidence available on record suggesting that the assessee or...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - addition u/s 68 - Merely on an allegations levelled by DIT (Inv.), as in this case explaining the general modus operandi carried out by...

Addition u/s 68 - bogus liability allegedly shown by the assessee - receipt of the shares on loan - It appears to us that the nature of transactions as well as the modus...

Modus operandi for tax evasion - Sham transactions - In three days, the assessee himself, who was having no worth, alleged that he borrowed Rs.25.97 lakhs from 148...

Accommodation of bogus transaction - entry operator - Presumption of Section 132(4A) stood against the assessee - complete onus to negate the same was on assessee which...

Quick Updates: