Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The prerequisites towards applicability ...

Income Tax

April 4, 2023

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The prerequisites towards applicability of Explanation-5A has not been demonstrated by the Revenue either in the penalty order or the first appellate order thereon. Thus, the imposition of penalty under the shelter of Explanation 5A is clearly without sanction of law. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The prerequisites towards applicability ...

Income Tax

April 4, 2023

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the amended provision of Explanation 5A made applicable w.r.e.f from 1.6.2007 cannot be pressed into service.

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the fact that the assessee and his son have declared the undisclosed income in their individual return of income and have paid taxes but capital...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - proof of contravention of provisions provided under explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) - On reference to the provisions of explanation 5A to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - surrender of income - suo motu further income declared in the returns filed u/s 153A - Explanation 5A has specific application, the contention...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO has levied penalty u/s 271(1)(c) only invoking the Explanation 5A below section 271(1)(c) and not held the assessee liable for concealment of...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) OR 271AAA - unexplained cash deposits - the rate of penalty @ 200% is contemplated only u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act and not u/s.271AAA of the Act. It...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - difference of income in the return filed u/s.139(1) and 153A - there was no such allegation that of assessee was found to be the owner of any...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income in the return filed in response to notice u/s 153A/153C - The tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee, upholding the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has given sufficient explanation though not found satisfactory by AO - No merit in levying penalty.

Quick Updates: