Validity of assessment against non existent company - ...

Income Tax

July 28, 2023

Validity of assessment against non existent company - amalgamation proceedings concluded - the assessment order passed on a non-existent Company is bad in law, inasmuch as, on the date of passing of the assessment order, the respondent company was not in existence, and as such no any liability can be fastened on a non-existent entity. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of assessment against non existent company - ...

Income Tax

July 28, 2023

You may also like:

Validity of assessment - the assessment order passed in the name of non-existent entity is invalid and subsequent proceedings arising there from are vitiated

Validity of reopening of assessment - notice against non existent entity / amalgamated company - Notices issued.

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - notice issued to a company which is non-existent on the date as it stood amalgamated with the appellant/petitioner - ts...

Assessment against amalgamating company - notice u/s 143(2) was issued to non-existent company - Participation in the proceedings by the appellant in the circumstances...

Draft assessment order u/s 144C in the name of a non-existent company - amalgamation of the company under the scheme of merger - the draft order framed u/s 144C(1) of...

Reopening of assessment post amalgamation process - Mere activation of PAN number may not give a right to the revenue to issue notice to a non-existent entity....

Assessment order passed on an non- existent entity - Fact of amalgamation was not disclosed in the business/organization column and the assessment order indicated the...

Assessment against a company which was non-existent is invalid - AT

Validity of reassessment order made in the name of defunct company which has since merged with the petitioner - it would be absurd to hold that the order has been passed...

Reassessment proceedings issued in the name of a non-existent entity - amalgamation of a company - The stand of the revenue that the reassessment was justified in view...

Quick Updates: