Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2023 Year 2023 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee preferred a claim which was not ...

Income Tax

August 28, 2023

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee preferred a claim which was not acceptable to the Revenue - threat of penalty cannot become a gag and/or haunt an assessee for making a claim which may be erroneous or wrong, when it is made during the course of the assessment proceedings - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because assessee claimed depreciation at 25% treating items to be plant, which claim was not acceptable to revenue, would not by itself...

  2. Merely because assessee had claimed expenditure which was not accepted or not acceptable to Revenue that by itself would not attract a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because, the assessee did not preferred any appeal against the said disallowance does not make it an inadvertent mistake - penalty confirmed - AT

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee had sold a plot of land in respect of which deduction u/s 54B claimed - withdrawal of deduction u/s 54B - merely because the assessee...

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Revenue expenditure or not - expenses on NPA’s - merely because the assessee has claimed the expenditure, which claim was not accepted or not...

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - wrong claim of set off loss - explanation was not found false - no iota of evidence of concealment of any fact relating to particulars of income...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Just because assessee preferred a claim which was not found acceptable by the AO, would not mean that claim was not a bonafide or was based on...

  9. Penalty being 300% by invoking Section 271(1)(c) - return was revised before completion of assessment - Revenue is not justified in imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - HC

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Held that:- Wrongful claim of depreciation - The attempts made by the assessee are indicative of frivolous nature of claim - penalty confirmed - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates